Please read, I borrowed this post from Mike Geary

I borrowed this post from Mike Geary I think it is very important for all to read this.
Most of us don’t realize what the power of good nutrition can do for us.

Please read, very important.
I know this has turned out to be a massively controversial topic in the media
with Angelina Jolie’s recent double mastectomy.

One thing I want us to keep in mind is that this was a personal decision for
Angelina, and that deserves to be respected.  To each their own.

However, the big concern here is that so many other women around the world that
look up to such a high profile actress might think this is the best route to go
if you carry the BRCA1 gene, that indicates increased risk for breast cancer.

The big issue is that Angelina was essentially LIED to about her risks.
Just because you carry a gene that increases your likelyhood for a certain
cancer doesn’t mean you can’t create a biochemical environment in your body
that prevents the expression of that gene.

Remember that this isn’t an issue of “curing cancer”….  She
didn’t have any cancer to begin with!  This is an issue of PREVENTING
cancer.  And to cut off perfectly healthy body parts with the thought that
you “might” somebody get cancer is not a mindset that I’ll ever
understand.

Remember that the alternative is to create a biochemical environment in your
body throughout your life that prevents the cancer in the first place
regardless of which “risky genes” you carry.

A controversial article was published by NaturalNews.com about this very topic,
and I’ll let you read it below and decide for yourself…

How Angelina Jolie was Duped by Cancer Doctors into Self Mutilation for
Cancer She Never Had

by Mike Adams, NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) In a New York Times op-ed explaining her decision to have both of
her breasts surgically removed even though she doesn’t have breast cancer,
Angelina Jolie cited risk numbers as key to her decision. She said that doctors
told her she had an “87% risk of breast cancer.” Her solution?
Undergo three months of surgical procedures and have her breasts cut out.

Problem solved, right? With her breasts removed, she says her risk of breast
cancer is now reduced to a mere 5 percent. The same bizarre logic can also be
applied to men who cut off their testicles to “prevent testicular
cancer” or people who cut out their colons to “prevent colorectal
cancer.” But that would be insane, so nobody does that, because one of the
most basic principles of medicine is that you don’t subject patients to the
considerable risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia to remove organs that
have no disease!

But the really sad part about all this is that Angelina Jolie was lied to. She
didn’t have an 87% risk of breast cancer in the first place. All the women
reading her NYT op-ed piece are also being lied to.

Here’s why…

How cancer doctors lie with statistics and use fear to scare women into
high-profit procedures

The very idea that breast cancer is a “percent risk” is a complete
lie. In reality, everyone has cancer micro-tumors in their bodies, including
myself. Cancer is not a disease you just “get” like being randomly
struck by lightning. It’s something you must “manage” or
“prevent” day by day, meal by meal, through a lifestyle choice that
involves vitamin D supplementation, nutrition, superfoods, vegetable juices and
avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals and radiation.

So when a doctor says you have a “chance” of getting cancer, what
he’s implying is that you have no control over cancer, and that’s an outright
lie. Cancer quackery, in other words.

Even Jolie with her BRCA1 gene that’s linked to breast cancer can quite easily
follow a dietary and lifestyle plan that suppresses BRCA1 gene expression. It’s
not rocket science. It’s not even difficult. It can be done with simple foods
that cost a few dollars a day. Those foods include raw citrus, resveratrol (red
grapes or red wine), raw cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 oils and much more.
Those same foods also help prevent heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and
other chronic diseases.

Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), by the way, a natural chemical found in cruciferous
vegetables like broccoli and cabbage, offers powerful prevention against BRCA1
gene expression. But you don’t hear cancer doctors telling women to “eat
more cabbage” because that doesn’t make the cancer industry any money. You
can buy I3C as a potent nutritional supplement from a variety of sources. It’s
literally cancer prevention in a capsule.

So the whole “chance” argument is pure quackery. There is no chance
involved in whether you get cancer. It’s all cause and effect. You are either
living a pro-cancer lifestyle and therefore growing cancer, or you’re living an
anti-cancer lifestyle and keeping cancer in check so that it never becomes a
problem. Cause and effect is what results in either the growth of cancer tumors
or the prevention of cancer tumors. There is no “luck” involved.

It’s fascinating, isn’t it, that medical doctors don’t believe in luck or
voodoo on any topic other than cancer. But when it comes to cancer, they want
all women to be suckered into the victim mentality that cancer is purely a
matter of “luck” and therefore women have no control over their own
health outcomes. How dis-empowering! How sick! How incredibly exploitive of
women!

If you really want to be informed about breast cancer and the corrupt,
dishonest cancer industry, read my related article 10 Facts about the Breast
Cancer Industry You’re Not Supposed to Know. Or listen to our upcoming FREE
Cancer Solutions Summit broadcasting this coming Monday, May 20th.

Why doesn’t the cancer industry empower women with a sense of control over
their own health?

I find it astonishing that the cancer industry doesn’t believe in cause and
effect. They would rather scare women with “risk” statistics that
imply people have no control over cancer. Empowering women with a sense of
control over their own health is the last thing the cancer industry wants to
do, because that would cause them to lose customers and lose money.

It’s far more profitable to scare all women into a state of such irrational panic
that they agree to the most insane things imaginable such as chopping off both
their healthy breasts even though they have no cancer. Such women are then
convinced they’ve literally saved their own lives by agreeing to be mutilated
by cancer surgeons.

“My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to
under 5 percent,” says Jolie. “I can tell my children that they don’t
need to fear they will lose me to breast cancer.”

Will she also tell her children they should mutilate themselves, too, as a form
of medical disease prevention? And what happens if she learns she has a risk of
brain cancer? Does she chop off her head and call it a cure?

The scam of making women believe there is only ONE way to reduce your
“risk” of breast cancer

The other enormous scam in all this is the idea that there’s only one way to
reduce your “risk” of breast cancer. Even if you believe the
fictitious number of “87% risk,” why does everyone automatically
assume there is one and only one way to lower that risk?

“For any woman reading this, I hope it helps you to know you have
options,” writes Jolie in the NYT. Yet she utterly fails to offer women
any options other than the one she took: check in to a cancer center and let
them play “cut-poison-burn” on your body. Jolie’s op-ed piece, which
reads as if it were written by the public relations department of the Pink
Lotus Breast Center, offers nothing in the way of nutrition advice, lifestyle
choices, holistic therapies, wellness, alternative medicine… nothing! What an
incredible disservice to all the women of America…

In the world of health, nutrition and cancer, there are thousands of ways to
prevent cancer and suppress the expression of BRCA1 genes. But Jolie and the
cancer industry seem to imply no options exist other than chemotherapy,
radiotherapy or surgery. Three options only. Nothing else exists in their
world, not nutritional prevention, not vitamin D therapy, not vitamin C
potentiated micro-chemotherapy, not ozone therapy, acupuncture, Chinese herbal
medicine, stress reduction or anything else. You are supposed to believe that
none of these things exist!

And why? Because the cancer industry wants to funnel women like cattle into
their slash-poison-burn system of quack treatments. And Angelina Jolie is their
new cheerleader. Scarred and no doubt experiencing the chest and armpit
numbness that almost always accompanies mastectomy surgery, she now seeks to
“inspire” other women to exercise their own sick “choice”
and have their breasts removed, too!

It is the sickest invocation of women’s power that I’ve ever witnessed. This is
not empowering women, it’s marching them into self-mutilation. And the
“risk” is a complete fraud. In truth, Angelina Jolie had a higher
risk of dying on the operating table than dying from breast cancer if she
simply followed an anti-cancer lifestyle.

Don’t be tricked into self-mutilation by cancer industry quacks

In summary:

• The claim that you have a “percent risk” of breast cancer is a big
lie which implies you have no control over cancer.

• BRCA1 genes can be kept quiet (suppressed) through proper foods and lifestyle
choices. A gene is not a death sentence.

• The implication that there is only ONE way to reduce breast cancer risk is a
complete lie. There are thousands of options and strategies for preventing
cancer. Never be cornered into surgery by a group of surgeons pushing
irrational fear.

• Cancer micro-tumors exist in everyone. Cancer must be “managed” in
everyone to keep it in check and avoid the growth of tumors.

• The cancer industry tricks women using unethical fear tactics to scare women
with false statistics into high-profit cancer procedures that only cause them
harm.

• The claim that cutting off healthy breasts somehow “empowers” women
is sick and demented. Women are far more empowered by honest information on
nutrition and healthy living that allows them to keep their bodies intact
rather than being sliced up by dishonest cancer surgeons.

-Mike Adams, NaturalNews.com

————————

I told you that it was a bit of a controversial article.  But Mr Adams is
on point with a lot of his arguments.

The important thing here is that gene expression can be suppressed with the
right biochemical environment in your body through the right superfoods,
preventing nutrient deficiencies, balancing hormones, controlling stress,
avoiding inflammatory foods, avoiding carcinogenic chemicals, etc, etc.

In fact, remember that you can greatly reduce your risk of cancer and all other
degenerative diseases by eating the right foods such as those featured in my
manual here:

101
unique superfoods that control blood pressure, fight diabetes, protect brain
health & help prevent cancer.

You do have power over prevention if you control your internal environment.

PS — fwd this email to your friends and family that are interested in this topic.

Mike Geary

Certified Nutrition Specialist

Certified Personal Trainer